 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
|
 |
Argentina WHEREAS a study by the nongovernmental organization Poder Ciudadano reiterates that in the first half of 2005, just as in 2004, the national government placed government advertising without following objective criteria WHEREASan IAPA study at the beginning of this year reported that the government used placement of its advertising to reward or punish media outlets and journalists, and this situation was not corrected WHEREASthis corrupt practice occurs as well in provinces and cities WHEREAS
Article 6 of the Declaration of Chapultepec states, “The media and journalists should neither be discriminated against nor favored because of what they write or say” THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE IAPA RESOLVES to reiterate to the respective national authorities that in placement of government advertising, they must follow technical norms and guarantee transp
|
