|
|

58th IAPA General Assembly
JW Marriott Hotel & Stellaris Casino Lima
October 26-29, Peru
|
|
| Country-by-Country
Reports |
CANADA
Freedom of expression has been affected by judicial
orders and legislative initiatives, particularly in the field of access to government
information, during the second semester of 2002.
In August, the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ) protested an increase
in fees for obtaining copies of public records under the Freedom of Information
and Protection of Privacy Act in Nova Scotia province.
The CAJ declared that the Nova Scotia government’s action was an unprecedented
attack on the public’s right to access government-held information that
affected their lives.
The media organization reported that five months after the provincial Tory politicians
imposed the highest access fees in Canada, the number of requests for public
information had dramatically declined. CAJ president Robert Cribb stated that,
“the sharp drop in access to information requests is sure to prompt a
sigh of relief among Nova Scotia Tories, who now know their actions are more
comfortably hidden from the public.”
Several news media organizations united in protesting a federal government proposal,
made in response to world terrorism, to build a massive Big Brother database
of personal information about every Canadian air traveler. The government is
allegedly preparing the database with information relevant to six years of air
travel of all travel activities – every destination, accompanying passengers,
how the ticket was paid, the duration of the stay, the amount of luggage and
even dietary preferences.
Recently, a judge allowed for two news media organizations to join in a legal
challenge to a search warrant and assistance order against the National Post
by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police that required the editor-in-chief to hand
over to the police some documents mailed to the newspaper last year. The legal
challenge presented by the National Post is aimed at defending the right of
a journalist to communicate with confidential sources.
The judicial order allowing The Globe and Mail and CBS to be a part of the legal
challenge to the warrant was described by the Canadian Journalists for Free
Expression organization as a “heartening development in the fight for
press freedom.”
The Canadian Supreme Court decided in June against an appeal presented by the
provincial government of Nova Scotia to a ruling ordering the release of background
information on cabinet decisions. Press organizations hailed the ruling as a
victory for access to information.
An overwhelming majority of Canadians want the federal government to protect
freedom of expression in the media and deal with the issue of concentration
of ownership, according to a national public opinion poll released in July.
The poll, conducted for Canada’s largest media labor union, the Communications,
Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, was conducted 12 days after Ottawa
Citizen publisher Russell Mills was fired for writing an editorial calling on
Prime Minister Jean Chrétien to resign.
The survey found that most Canadians believe media owners exercise too much
control over the content of news and opinion in Canada’s newspapers, radio
and television stations, and that the issue of media concentration warrants
action by the federal government.
questions
or comments? e-mail us
Copyright © 2003 Inter American Press Association.
All rights reserved.
. | |
|